Our house in Anghiari is a tower, probably a watch tower originally as it overlooks the Tiber Valley. Living in a tower means living with stairs leading from one floor to the next, two sets of them in our case. Living in a tower built in the 1300’s means that it has undergone a number of renovations during its centuries of use. Terry and I wish we could see a time lapse video of all the changes made over its history. We know of the renovations that the previous owner made–moving the kitchen from the first (U S second) floor to the ground floor was a major shift in the way the house was used and one we fully appreciate. This post, however is about the real oddities of the house, the truly eccentric features that make our home unique.
First, there are the steps just inside our entry door. The only term that can fairly describe them is Ugly. They look like they belong outside, perhaps leading to a tumble down shed on the back of a property but instead are one of the first things seen when entering our house. In addition, they are difficult stairs with risers much higher than on modern, built to code, steps.

As you can see, the lower steps are only about three quarters the width of the upper steps. Were the lower ones cut? In their current configuration, they leave room for the entry door to swing open, which couldn’t happen if they were the same width as the upper steps. Assuming they have been cut, then when?

On the threshold leading into the cloakroom at the top of the stairs, there is a depression indicating the use of a pintle. I can only speculate about the kind of door original to this entry, but it may have been a single wooden panel, which pivoted on the pintle. Today the width of the doorway is very narrow because the existing walls of the cloakroom encroach into the space, but certainly the original opening had to be much wider.
Since I find these steps so unattractive, why not replace them? Well, because they are clearly very old, possibly as the old as the house itself and are part of its story. Many occupants of this house have climbed those stairs, maybe including the soldiers who fought in the Battle of Anghiari and I just wouldn’t like erasing that little bit of history.
Walking through the entry room into the kitchen, we see a door jamb that today is in the outer wall of our house. Where did it once lead? Who knows. It seems most likely that it was an outer door as there is no indication in the present structure that there was another room into which this door might lead. Now it simply frames shelves holding pans.

Turning left from here takes you through another doorway into the dining room. On the right side door jamb there is a cross etched into the stone. While we were quite delighted to find this symbol in our house, it is apparently not unusual in older houses. Our friend Elga has three such crosses in her agriturisimo.

Next, on the outer wall of the dining room there is a window at floor level. In the recess for the window stands my Mexican turtle tureen, seeming to be guarding the opening.

Viewed from the outside, some sense can be made of the window’s placement. A door to the exterior was at one time located here but it was filled in at some point in the tower’s history, and only the small window opening left. Since the window is at floor level in the current configuration, the base of the doorway had to have been on a yet lower floor, made possible by the slope of the land. Today that level contains our cantina, a store room filled with Terry’s paintings. The cantina does not extend as far as this doorway and was walled off at some point.
At the threshold of the lower door, where one would step outside, there is a low wall providing a walkway, perhaps used for monitoring activity, even threats from unwelcome visitors, or maybe simply leading to ground level. Today, that wall is used to hold plants that line the stairs to our entry door.

Another window in the larger, upper doorway is high on our dining room wall and, if the brickwork is a good indicator, must have been larger at one point. Now it is just another oddly placed and rather small window. Perhaps someday further research or analysis by a practicing architectural historian will explain the sequence and purpose of the two doors, but for now that remains unknown.
Adjacent to the kitchen, a stairway, built in recent times, takes us upstairs to the first (US second) floor landing and hall, living room and bedroom. When sitting in the living room, it is obvious that the outer wall curves slightly and the curve continues through the adjacent wall of the hall at the top of the stairs. While this would not be evident in a photograph of the wall itself, the construction of the beams shows how the curve had to be accommodated.

This method of adjusting the ceiling to the curve can be seen in the outer rooms of all three floors. The curve leads to speculation about the original form of the tower. From the outside it appears to be rectilinear, but was it, at one time, rounded? Rounded towers developed later than square ones and were somewhat more defensible since arrows were deflected more easily than when shot at a flat wall. However, the slight curve apparent today does not necessarily suggest a fully rounded structure. It is just another matter giving rise to speculation and puzzlement.
Along the curved outer wall of the living room, there is a non-operational fireplace. We don’t know when it was blocked and made unusable except that it would not have been done until improved heating systems were available. Today a small laundry room backs up to the fireplace wall, a renovation that eliminated the flue and chimney in favor of a more convenient laundry space. But the oddest thing about this fireplace is the result of a remodel that added a partial wall between the living room and hall landing.

You can see that the mantle of the fireplace finishes with a rounded end extending beyond the right side of the fireplace surround. Now look at the left side of the fireplace.

The left side of the fireplace abuts the living room wall and the mantle appears to be cut off. However, that is not the case, as you can see below.

Here you can see that the left side of the fireplace protrudes through the wall into the hall. Why wasn’t a more aesthetically pleasing option used? Simply building the wall a little further out would have been an obvious alternative or eliminating the partial wall altogether and creating a larger, more open room. However, on the left is the door that leads to the present laundry room and therein lies the problem. Even I at 5’4″ have to duck when going through this door because a slanting beam and stairs to the third level compromise clear passage. All decisions about construction were dictated by the wish to have a laundry room, which I have to admit I do appreciate.
The final oddity is in the en suite bath in our bedroom/dressing room area.

The lintel and its supports shown above appear to be the remains of a doorway. If that was indeed the case, then its placement on what is now an outer wall on an upper floor is surprising, even more so because this has the appearance of an exterior element. Both Terry and I have interpreted the lintel as a late installation meant to provide an interesting feature, not part of the original structure. The lintel, with its tetrahedral design is hard to date with certainty, but clearly it is a rather ancient element curiously placed now in a modern bathroom. Above the lintel, you can also see the beams adjusting to the curve of this exterior wall.
Archaeology is the fascinating science we know because every object represents an activity, a process. All of the curious architectural features recounted above reflect a decision made by someone in the past who followed that decision with a subsequent action. It is left for us to wonder and speculate about who, why, when and how. And, yes, we love our tower house with all its eccentricities and will leave them for the next occupant to puzzle over.






















